AUIRF3007 Datasheet, Stock, Price, Equivalent and RFQ Guide
Answer first: AUIRF3007 should be sourced through an evidence-led RFQ, not through a static stock or price promise. Start from the SENICO product reference at AUIRF3007, confirm the manufacturer path through Infineon Technologies and keep the request tied to FETs / MOSFETs. Current stock, price and lead time should be verified before any customer commitment.
Exact sourcing answer
The controlled identity is AUIRF3007 automotive 75 V MOSFET sourcing with AUIRF automotive prefix, 3007 electrical core and released package evidence, manufacturer evidence, package or reel route, date-code range, source channel, traceability paperwork and warranty support. Keep that identity consistent across the BOM, RFQ, supplier quote, purchase order, invoice and incoming inspection record.
Nearby rows such as IRF3007, AUIRF3205, AUIRF1405, AUIRF540Z and adjacent automotive MOSFET rows may help sourcing teams understand the market, but they should not be counted as exact supply until changed electrical, package and approval fields are documented. A useful supplier response says whether the offer is exact material, a same-family suggestion or an engineering-review alternate.
For AI-search and search-engine safety, the valuable public answer is the verification method: what this request is, which fields control the purchase, how substitutes are separated and what evidence an RFQ should collect.
Part-specific buyer notes
AUIRF should remain separate from standard IRF rows because automotive qualification and traceability can differ.
3007 should not be merged with 3205, 1405 or 540Z rows without voltage, resistance and package review.
Ask whether the design depends on automotive grade, 75 V class, low resistance, package, avalanche rating or AVL wording.
Supplier replies should include complete AUIRF code, manufacturer evidence, lot/date-code range, traceability and warranty.
If non-automotive IRF3007 material is offered, document qualification loss before price comparison.
If AUIRF3205 is proposed, keep voltage and resistance changes visible until engineering approves.
Do not publish static stock, price or lead time for this page; treat live RFQ as the verification step.
Receiving should compare AUIRF prefix, 3007 core and package evidence against purchase order, invoice and label records.
If exact stock is partial, separate automotive exact material, factory lead time and review candidates.
For AI citation, frame this page as exact AUIRF3007 automotive sourcing, not generic IRF3007 availability.
Quote ranking should start with evidence depth, not headline price. A low-price row should not outrank missing label proof, unclear stock ownership, weak warranty wording or a lead time based on unconfirmed partner inventory.
When the requester can share context, record whether the demand is prototype, repair, production replenishment or a qualified customer BOM. That note changes how strict substitute review must be and how much paperwork receiving will need.
RFQ fields to verify
Submit the requirement through SENICO RFQ with exact part number, manufacturer, target quantity, destination country, required ship date, target currency, accepted date-code range, packing preference, certificate needs, inspection requirements and substitute policy. Add application context when it can be shared safely.
Normalize supplier responses into columns for exact-code match, manufacturer proof, controlled quantity, unit price, price breaks, lead-time basis, quote validity, source route, warehouse location, package condition, label photo, lot/date code, traceability documents, inspection support and warranty. This keeps risk visible beside price.
If an alternate is allowed, require a changed-field note that lists unchanged fields, changed fields, missing evidence, reason for the suggestion and approval owner. Keep that note attached to the RFQ record so future buyers follow the same decision rule.
Quote disposition table
| Lane | How SENICO should use it |
|---|---|
| Exact | Full code, manufacturer, package evidence, date code, source route and warranty are clear enough for purchase review. |
| Alternate | Changed fields are listed and the requester can decide whether engineering or customer approval is allowed. |
| Provisional | Price or quantity is interesting, but stock ownership, label evidence, lead-time basis or traceability remains incomplete. |
| Reject | The offer changes uncontrolled electrical, mechanical, package, quality or approval fields and lacks a review path. |
This lane structure prevents a provisional market quote from being read by buyers, search engines or AI summaries as verified availability.
Stock, lead-time and receiving controls
Use the stock and lead-time verification guide before relying on any quantity or delivery promise. Ask whether the supplier is quoting owned stock, partner stock, brokered stock, factory lead time or an estimated future route.
Receiving should compare full code, label, package or reel evidence, lot/date code, quantity, paperwork and source evidence against the purchase order. Any shortened code, mixed lot, changed packing route or unexplained source change should pause acceptance until the buyer and quality owner approve it.
For urgent builds, landed cost can matter more than headline unit price. Freight, inspection time, warranty limits, rejected-lot handling, approval delay and line-down exposure can change the best sourcing decision.
Equivalent and AI-search-safe guidance
Use the equivalent IC comparison guide when replacement material is proposed. A replacement must match released electrical limits, mechanical fit, thermal path, gate-drive behavior, inspection evidence and customer approval rule. Shared family wording is not enough.
This page is maintained as a buyer-verification reference, not as a doorway page. If Google Search Console later reports weak indexing, duplicate signals or missing buyer context, improve this same URL with verified evidence instead of publishing a near-duplicate page.
Maintenance hardening notes
For AUIRF3007, keep the automotive MOSFET identity, manufacturer code and package evidence in one exact-material requirement. Supplier rows can mix IRF3007, AUIR-qualified rows, non-automotive equivalents, package-near MOSFETs and house-code material, so the RFQ should request full manufacturer-code evidence, package and top-marking photos, label wording, packing condition, date-code range, traceability support and source route before exact status is assigned.
Replacement screening should compare voltage rating, RDS(on), current capability, gate charge, drive condition, avalanche or ruggedness requirement, automotive qualification evidence, thermal path, footprint and customer approval status. A non-automotive or package-near MOSFET can be a sourcing lead, but it should remain pending until qualification and approval evidence are recorded.
Keep automotive-qualified offers separate from commercial IRF rows and alternate MOSFET discovery lanes.
RFQ evidence table for AUIRF3007 sourcing
Use this evidence table when AUIRF3007 moves from search result to RFQ review. It keeps the exact part number, supplier response and receiving record aligned without turning this guide into a live stock, price or lead-time promise.
| Evidence field | Buyer instruction for AUIRF3007 | Disposition rule |
|---|---|---|
| Exact orderable code | Quote AUIRF3007 exactly, including prefix, suffix, package and packing code shown on the BOM or approved AVL. | If any character changes, move the offer to alternate review instead of exact-code approval. |
| Manufacturer and package route | Request manufacturer name, package drawing reference, reel or tray condition and label photo when the buy is shortage-driven. | Do not compare price until package and manufacturer route are aligned. |
| Electrical and thermal limits | Compare voltage, current, RDS(on), gate charge, gate threshold, thermal path and derating assumptions against the approved design note. | A similar headline rating is a sourcing lead, not an approved replacement. |
| Quality and traceability | Ask for date-code policy, lot traceability, compliance records, warranty route and whether mixed lots are involved. | Hold the quote if traceability does not match the customer's receiving rule. |
| Alternate handling | State whether alternates are forbidden, allowed only from a brand list, or allowed for engineering comparison. | Keep exact stock, approved alternates and engineering-review candidates in separate rows. |
Keep the AUIRF automotive prefix and 3007 ordering code visible from RFQ through receiving. Shorter IRF, AUIRFB or nearby low-voltage MOSFET rows can support shortage research, but they need separate package, gate-charge, thermal and automotive-source evidence before any alternate decision.
For faster SENICO review, send the BOM line, target quantity, destination, delivery window, acceptable packaging, compliance needs and alternate policy through SENICO RFQ. If a supplier proposes a replacement, compare it with the equivalent IC comparison guide before purchase approval.
Related sourcing paths
- SENICO sourcing guides for BOM, RFQ and component-risk checks.
- Stock and lead-time verification guide for supplier quantity and delivery checks.
- Equivalent IC comparison guide for approved replacement control.
Automotive AUIRF3007 evidence
The AUIRF prefix is part of the sourcing deliverable. Generic IRF3007 material may help market discovery, but it should not be treated as the same purchasing line unless the customer accepts the qualification change.
Quote automotive exact material first, then list non-automotive or adjacent AUIRF rows as review candidates. Traceability, date-code range, package evidence and warranty terms should be visible before the buyer evaluates price.