IPB100N06S304 Datasheet, Stock, Price, Equivalent and RFQ Guide

Answer first: IPB100N06S304 should be sourced through an evidence-led RFQ, not through a static stock or price promise. Start from the SENICO product reference at IPB100N06S304, confirm the manufacturer path through Infineon Technologies, and keep the request tied to FETs / MOSFETs. Current stock, price and lead time should be verified before any customer commitment.

Exact sourcing answer

The controlled identity is Infineon N-channel MOSFET sourcing for the 100N06 S304 lane with 100N06 current and voltage class with S304 segment, manufacturer evidence, package or reel route, date-code range, source channel, traceability paperwork and warranty support. Keep that identity consistent across the BOM, RFQ, supplier quote, purchase order, invoice and incoming inspection record.

Nearby rows such as IPB100N06S3L04, IPB100N06S2L05ATMA2, IPB120N06S4H1ATMA1 and IPB80N06S405ATMA2 may help sourcing teams understand the market, but they should not be counted as exact supply until changed electrical, package and approval fields are documented. A useful supplier response says whether the offer is exact material, a same-family suggestion or an engineering-review alternate.

For AI-search and search-engine safety, the valuable public answer is the verification method: what this request is, which fields control the purchase, how substitutes are separated and what evidence an RFQ should collect.

Part-specific buyer notes

The 100N06 current class should remain separate from 80N06 and 120N06 rows unless margins are approved.

S304 should not be treated as the same lane as S3L04, S2L05 or S4H1 branches without changed-segment approval.

If an ATMA route is supplied, record it explicitly because the requested code does not include that suffix.

Ask whether the design depends on 60 V margin, gate-drive range, switching behavior, loss budget or package thermal path.

Supplier replies should include full Infineon code, label photo, lot/date-code range, package condition, ownership and warranty.

If a 120N06 or 80N06 row is proposed, document changed current class before price ranking.

Receiving should compare the S304 identity against purchase order, invoice and reel label before release.

If exact supply is limited, split exact stock, factory lead time and engineering-review alternates.

A cheaper 60 V neighbor should not outrank missing S304, current-class or traceability evidence.

The public answer should remain RFQ-focused and avoid live price, stock or lead-time claims.

For repeated demand, keep accepted S304 substitute boundaries attached to the BOM record.

If S304 and S3L04 offers are quoted together, ask for separated quantities and changed-field notes.

For urgent builds, record whether partial exact supply is safer than a same-family segment change.

Customer communication should state route and segment differences before any substitute is presented.

Quote ranking should start with evidence depth, not headline price. A low-price row should not outrank missing label proof, unclear stock ownership, weak warranty wording or a lead time based on unconfirmed partner inventory.

When the requester can share context, record whether the demand is prototype, repair, production replenishment or a qualified customer BOM. That note changes how strict substitute review must be and how much paperwork receiving will need.

Maintenance hardening notes

IPB100N06S304 should stay in the 100N06 current-class lane, with S304 treated as the controlling segment. A broad 60 V Infineon search may return 80N06, 120N06, S3L04 or S2L05 rows, but those suggestions change the current class, segment branch or route evidence and should not be merged into the exact quote line.

Ask suppliers to identify whether their response is the suffix-free S304 code, an ATMA-coded route of the same base, or a same-voltage engineering-review alternate. That distinction matters because the requested code does not show an ATMA suffix, so a route-coded offer may still need receiving and BOM approval notes.

For high-current power boards, collect application context around conduction loss, switching behavior and thermal history before any substitute is ranked. If the customer has a released qualification record, attach the S304 boundary to the RFQ so future buyers do not treat S3L04 or S2L05 as a casual replacement.

RFQ fields to verify

Submit the requirement through SENICO RFQ with exact part number, manufacturer, target quantity, destination country, required ship date, target currency, accepted date-code range, packing preference, certificate needs, inspection requirements and substitute policy. Add application context when it can be shared safely.

Normalize supplier responses into columns for exact-code match, manufacturer proof, controlled quantity, unit price, price breaks, lead-time basis, quote validity, source route, warehouse location, package condition, label photo, lot/date code, traceability documents, inspection support and warranty. This keeps risk visible beside price.

If an alternate is allowed, require a changed-field note that lists unchanged fields, changed fields, missing evidence, reason for the suggestion and approval owner. Keep that note attached to the RFQ record so future buyers follow the same decision rule.

Quote disposition table

Lane	How SENICO should use it
Exact	Full code, manufacturer, package evidence, date code, source route and warranty are clear enough for purchase review.
Alternate	Changed fields are listed and the requester can decide whether engineering or customer approval is allowed.
Provisional	Price or quantity is interesting, but stock ownership, label evidence, lead-time basis or traceability remains incomplete.
Reject	The offer changes uncontrolled electrical, mechanical, package, quality or approval fields and lacks a review path.

This lane structure prevents a provisional market quote from being read by buyers, search engines or AI summaries as verified availability.

Stock, lead-time and receiving controls

Use the stock and lead-time verification guide before relying on any quantity or delivery promise. Ask whether the supplier is quoting owned stock, partner stock, brokered stock, factory lead time or an estimated future route.

Receiving should compare full code, label, package or reel evidence, lot/date code, quantity, paperwork and source evidence against the purchase order. Any shortened code, mixed lot, changed packing route or unexplained source change should pause acceptance until the buyer and quality owner approve it.

For urgent builds, landed cost can matter more than headline unit price. Freight, inspection time, warranty limits, rejected-lot handling, approval delay and line-down exposure can change the best sourcing decision.

Equivalent and AI-search-safe guidance

Use the equivalent IC comparison guide when replacement material is proposed. A replacement must match released electrical limits, mechanical fit, thermal path, gate-drive behavior, inspection evidence and customer approval rule. Shared family wording is not enough.

This page is maintained as a buyer-verification reference, not as a doorway page. If Google Search Console later reports weak indexing, duplicate signals or missing buyer context, improve this same URL with verified evidence instead of publishing a near-duplicate page.

Related sourcing paths

• SENICO sourcing guides for BOM, RFQ and component-risk checks.
• Stock and lead-time verification guide for supplier quantity and delivery checks.
• Equivalent IC comparison guide for approved replacement control.