IPB100N06S3L04 Datasheet, Stock, Price, Equivalent and RFQ Guide

Answer first: IPB100N06S3L04 should be sourced through an evidence-led RFQ, not through a static stock or price promise. Start from the SENICO product reference at IPB100N06S3L04, confirm the manufacturer path through Infineon Technologies, and keep the request tied to FETs / MOSFETs. Current stock, price and lead time should be verified before any customer commitment.

Exact sourcing answer

The controlled identity is Infineon N-channel MOSFET sourcing for the 100N06 S3L04 lane with 100N06 current and voltage class with S3L04 segment, manufacturer evidence, package or reel route, date-code range, source channel, traceability paperwork and warranty support. Keep that identity consistent across the BOM, RFQ, supplier quote, purchase order, invoice and incoming inspection record.

Nearby rows such as IPB100N06S2L05ATMA2, IPB120N06S4H1ATMA1, IPB80N06S405ATMA2 and related 60 V rows may help sourcing teams understand the market, but they should not be counted as exact supply until changed electrical, package and approval fields are documented. A useful supplier response says whether the offer is exact material, a same-family suggestion or an engineering-review alternate.

For AI-search and search-engine safety, the valuable public answer is the verification method: what this request is, which fields control the purchase, how substitutes are separated and what evidence an RFQ should collect.

Part-specific buyer notes

The 100N06 current class should stay separate from 80N06 and 120N06 rows unless current, thermal and loss margins are approved.

Ask whether the design depends on 60 V margin, S3L04 switching behavior, gate-drive range, package thermal path or AVL release history.

S3L04 should not be blended with S2L05 or S4H1 branches without changed-segment approval.

Supplier replies should include full Infineon code, label photo, lot/date-code range, package condition, source ownership and warranty.

If an ATMA route is shown by a supplier, record it explicitly because route evidence can affect receiving.

For urgent demand, split exact supply, factory lead time and review candidates into separate RFQ lanes.

Receiving should compare the full S3L04 identity against purchase order, invoice and label evidence.

A lower-price 80N06 neighbor should not outrank missing current-class or segment evidence.

The public page should guide RFQ verification and avoid live stock, price or delivery commitments.

For repeat buys, keep accepted S3L04 substitute boundaries attached to the BOM record.

Mixed S3L and S2L offers should be separated before customer communication.

If suppliers combine multiple 60 V lanes in one offer, ask for separated quantities, labels and warranty terms.

For receiving, keep gate-drive and segment approval notes with the accepted lot record.

Quote ranking should start with evidence depth, not headline price. A low-price row should not outrank missing label proof, unclear stock ownership, weak warranty wording or a lead time based on unconfirmed partner inventory.

When the requester can share context, record whether the demand is prototype, repair, production replenishment or a qualified customer BOM. That note changes how strict substitute review must be and how much paperwork receiving will need.

Maintenance hardening notes

IPB100N06S3L04 should stay anchored to the 100N06 current class and S3L04 segment rather than being merged with nearby 80N06, 120N06, S2L05 or S4H1 rows. Those neighbors can help market research, but each one changes at least one sourcing or electrical review field.

For RFQ comparison, ask suppliers to separate exact S3L04 material, same-family suggestions and broader 60 V alternates into different quote lines. The buyer should see full label evidence, lot/date-code range, package route, source ownership and any changed gate-drive or thermal assumptions before price is ranked.

If the requirement comes from a released BOM, record whether S3L04 was selected for conduction loss, switching behavior, footprint or a customer AVL entry. That context keeps the public page useful as a verification answer while avoiding an unverified claim about available stock, price or delivery timing.

RFQ fields to verify

Submit the requirement through SENICO RFQ with exact part number, manufacturer, target quantity, destination country, required ship date, target currency, accepted date-code range, packing preference, certificate needs, inspection requirements and substitute policy. Add application context when it can be shared safely.

Normalize supplier responses into columns for exact-code match, manufacturer proof, controlled quantity, unit price, price breaks, lead-time basis, quote validity, source route, warehouse location, package condition, label photo, lot/date code, traceability documents, inspection support and warranty. This keeps risk visible beside price.

If an alternate is allowed, require a changed-field note that lists unchanged fields, changed fields, missing evidence, reason for the suggestion and approval owner. Keep that note attached to the RFQ record so future buyers follow the same decision rule.

Quote disposition table

Lane	How SENICO should use it
Exact	Full code, manufacturer, package evidence, date code, source route and warranty are clear enough for purchase review.
Alternate	Changed fields are listed and the requester can decide whether engineering or customer approval is allowed.
Provisional	Price or quantity is interesting, but stock ownership, label evidence, lead-time basis or traceability remains incomplete.
Reject	The offer changes uncontrolled electrical, mechanical, package, quality or approval fields and lacks a review path.

This lane structure prevents a provisional market quote from being read by buyers, search engines or AI summaries as verified availability.

Stock, lead-time and receiving controls

Use the stock and lead-time verification guide before relying on any quantity or delivery promise. Ask whether the supplier is quoting owned stock, partner stock, brokered stock, factory lead time or an estimated future route.

Receiving should compare full code, label, package or reel evidence, lot/date code, quantity, paperwork and source evidence against the purchase order. Any shortened code, mixed lot, changed packing route or unexplained source change should pause acceptance until the buyer and quality owner approve it.

For urgent builds, landed cost can matter more than headline unit price. Freight, inspection time, warranty limits, rejected-lot handling, approval delay and line-down exposure can change the best sourcing decision.

Equivalent and AI-search-safe guidance

Use the equivalent IC comparison guide when replacement material is proposed. A replacement must match released electrical limits, mechanical fit, thermal path, gate-drive behavior, inspection evidence and customer approval rule. Shared family wording is not enough.

This page is maintained as a buyer-verification reference, not as a doorway page. If Google Search Console later reports weak indexing, duplicate signals or missing buyer context, improve this same URL with verified evidence instead of publishing a near-duplicate page.

Related sourcing paths

• SENICO sourcing guides for BOM, RFQ and component-risk checks.
• Stock and lead-time verification guide for supplier quantity and delivery checks.
• Equivalent IC comparison guide for approved replacement control.