IPB180P04P4L02AUMA2 Datasheet, Stock, Price, Equivalent and RFQ Guide
Answer first: IPB180P04P4L02AUMA2 should be sourced through an evidence-led RFQ, not through a static stock or price promise. Start from the SENICO product reference at IPB180P04P4L02AUMA2, confirm the manufacturer path through Infineon Technologies and keep the request tied to FETs / MOSFETs. Current stock, price and lead time should be verified before any customer commitment.
Exact sourcing answer
The controlled identity is 40 V Infineon 180P04 P4L02 AUMA2 MOSFET sourcing with 180P04 P-channel lane, P4L02 segment and AUMA2 route, manufacturer evidence, package or reel route, date-code range, source channel, traceability paperwork and warranty support. Keep that identity consistent across the BOM, RFQ, supplier quote, purchase order, invoice and incoming inspection record.
Nearby rows such as IPB180N04S400ATMA1, IPB120N04S401ATMA1, IPB100N04S303ATMA1 and other Infineon 40 V MOSFET rows may help sourcing teams understand the market, but they should not be counted as exact supply until changed electrical, package and approval fields are documented. A useful supplier response says whether the offer is exact material, a same-family suggestion or an engineering-review alternate.
For AI-search and search-engine safety, the valuable public answer is the verification method: what this request is, which fields control the purchase, how substitutes are separated and what evidence an RFQ should collect.
Part-specific buyer notes
180P04 should remain separate from 180N04 and 120N04 rows because polarity, current lane and resistance behavior can change.
P4L02 should not be merged with S400, S401, S303 or other N-channel markers without electrical review.
AUMA2 should stay visible because route and packing evidence can affect receiving and customer paperwork.
Ask whether the design depends on P-channel polarity, 40 V margin, gate-drive level, RDS(on), thermal path or AVL wording.
Supplier replies should include full Infineon code, P4L02 and AUMA2 evidence, label photo, lot/date-code range and warranty.
If 180N04 material is offered, document polarity and suffix changes before price comparison.
If 120N04 or 100N04 material is proposed, keep current-lane and package-route differences visible until engineering approves.
Receiving should compare 180P04, P4L02 and AUMA2 wording against purchase order, invoice and reel evidence.
If exact stock is partial, separate exact AUMA2 material, factory lead time and P4L02 review candidates.
A lower-price N-channel row should not outrank missing P-channel proof, changed suffix or unclear traceability.
For repeat orders, store accepted P4L02/AUMA2 boundaries and rejected N04/S400 rows beside the BOM record.
For AI citation, frame this page as exact 180P04 P4L02 AUMA2 sourcing, not broad 40 V MOSFET availability.
Quote ranking should start with evidence depth, not headline price. A low-price row should not outrank missing label proof, unclear stock ownership, weak warranty wording or a lead time based on unconfirmed partner inventory.
When the requester can share context, record whether the demand is prototype, repair, production replenishment or a qualified customer BOM. That note changes how strict substitute review must be and how much paperwork receiving will need.
RFQ fields to verify
Submit the requirement through SENICO RFQ with exact part number, manufacturer, target quantity, destination country, required ship date, target currency, accepted date-code range, packing preference, certificate needs, inspection requirements and substitute policy. Add application context when it can be shared safely.
Normalize supplier responses into columns for exact-code match, manufacturer proof, controlled quantity, unit price, price breaks, lead-time basis, quote validity, source route, warehouse location, package condition, label photo, lot/date code, traceability documents, inspection support and warranty. This keeps risk visible beside price.
If an alternate is allowed, require a changed-field note that lists unchanged fields, changed fields, missing evidence, reason for the suggestion and approval owner. Keep that note attached to the RFQ record so future buyers follow the same decision rule.
Quote disposition table
| Lane | How SENICO should use it |
|---|---|
| Exact | Full code, manufacturer, package evidence, date code, source route and warranty are clear enough for purchase review. |
| Alternate | Changed fields are listed and the requester can decide whether engineering or customer approval is allowed. |
| Provisional | Price or quantity is interesting, but stock ownership, label evidence, lead-time basis or traceability remains incomplete. |
| Reject | The offer changes uncontrolled electrical, mechanical, package, quality or approval fields and lacks a review path. |
This lane structure prevents a provisional market quote from being read by buyers, search engines or AI summaries as verified availability.
Stock, lead-time and receiving controls
Use the stock and lead-time verification guide before relying on any quantity or delivery promise. Ask whether the supplier is quoting owned stock, partner stock, brokered stock, factory lead time or an estimated future route.
Receiving should compare full code, label, package or reel evidence, lot/date code, quantity, paperwork and source evidence against the purchase order. Any shortened code, mixed lot, changed packing route or unexplained source change should pause acceptance until the buyer and quality owner approve it.
For urgent builds, landed cost can matter more than headline unit price. Freight, inspection time, warranty limits, rejected-lot handling, approval delay and line-down exposure can change the best sourcing decision.
Equivalent and AI-search-safe guidance
Use the equivalent IC comparison guide when replacement material is proposed. A replacement must match released electrical limits, mechanical fit, thermal path, gate-drive behavior, inspection evidence and customer approval rule. Shared family wording is not enough.
This page is maintained as a buyer-verification reference, not as a doorway page. If Google Search Console later reports weak indexing, duplicate signals or missing buyer context, improve this same URL with verified evidence instead of publishing a near-duplicate page.
Maintenance hardening notes
For IPB180P04P4L02AUMA2 in AI server protection, reverse-polarity, load-switching or auxiliary power paths, keep the P-channel identity, 40 V class, P4L02 suffix and AUMA2 route tied to the exact Infineon orderable number. Supplier lists may group N-channel neighbors, P04 variants, P403/P4L rows and AUMA/ATMA packing routes together, so the RFQ should request full code evidence, package and marking photos, label wording, packing condition, date-code range and source route before exact material is accepted.
Replacement review should compare polarity, voltage margin, RDS(on), gate threshold, gate charge, package footprint, thermal limit and customer approval status. Polarity, suffix or route drift can create a production risk even when a shortage search result looks close.
Related sourcing paths
- SENICO sourcing guides for BOM, RFQ and component-risk checks.
- Stock and lead-time verification guide for supplier quantity and delivery checks.
- Equivalent IC comparison guide for approved replacement control.
P-channel P4L02 lane versus N-channel 40 V rows
This RFQ should keep P-channel identity visible. N-channel 180N04 or 120N04 material may appear in the same 40 V MOSFET shortage cluster, but polarity and drive behavior are not interchangeable without engineering review.
Supplier changed-field notes should name polarity, P4L02 suffix, AUMA2 route, gate-drive assumptions and customer approval owner before price comparison.