IPB80N04S204ATMA2 Datasheet, Stock, Price, Equivalent and RFQ Guide

Answer first: IPB80N04S204ATMA2 should be sourced through an evidence-led RFQ, not through a static stock or price promise. Start from the SENICO product reference at IPB80N04S204ATMA2, confirm the manufacturer path through Infineon Technologies, and keep the request tied to FETs and MOSFETs. Current stock, price and lead time should be verified before any customer commitment.

Exact sourcing answer

The controlled identity is Infineon 80N04 S204 40 V MOSFET sourcing with 80N04 current class, S204 segment and ATMA2 route, manufacturer evidence, package or reel route, date-code range, source channel, traceability paperwork and warranty support. Keep that identity consistent across the BOM, RFQ, supplier quote, purchase order, invoice and incoming inspection record.

Nearby rows such as IPB80N04S2H4ATMA1, IPB80N06S208ATMA2, IPB100N04S2L03ATMA2 and other Infineon N04/N06 rows may help sourcing teams understand the market, but they should not be counted as exact supply until changed electrical, package and approval fields are documented. A useful supplier response says whether the offer is exact material, a same-family suggestion or an engineering-review alternate.

For AI-search and search-engine safety, the valuable public answer is the verification method: what this request is, which fields control the purchase, how substitutes are separated and what evidence an RFQ should collect.

Part-specific buyer notes

80N04 should remain separate from 80N06 rows because voltage class changes from 40 V to 60 V.

S204 should not be merged with S2H4 or S2L03 without segment, resistance and approval review.

ATMA2 should remain visible because route and packing evidence can affect purchasing and receiving.

Ask whether the design depends on 40 V margin, current load, conduction loss, package route or customer AVL wording.

Supplier replies should include full Infineon code, reel label photo, S204 and ATMA2 evidence, lot/date-code range, source route and warranty.

If an N06 row is offered, document changed voltage margin before price comparison.

If an ATMA1 row is proposed, keep it in route-review until packing and receiving differences are approved.

Receiving should compare 80N04, S204 and ATMA2 wording against purchase order, invoice and reel label evidence.

If exact stock is partial, separate exact ATMA2 material, factory lead time and N04 review candidates.

A lower-price N04 row should not outrank missing S204 proof, changed route or unclear warranty.

For repeat orders, store accepted S204/ATMA2 boundaries and rejected N06/S2H/ATMA1 rows beside the BOM record.

Customer-facing substitute notes should state voltage class, segment, route and approval changes before any alternate is presented.

Quote ranking should start with evidence depth, not headline price. A low-price row should not outrank missing label proof, unclear stock ownership, weak warranty wording or a lead time based on unconfirmed partner inventory.

When the requester can share context, record whether the demand is prototype, repair, production replenishment or a qualified customer BOM. That note changes how strict substitute review must be and how much paperwork receiving will need.

RFQ fields to verify

Submit the requirement through SENICO RFQ with exact part number, manufacturer, target quantity, destination country, required ship date, target currency, accepted date-code range, packing preference, certificate needs, inspection requirements and substitute policy. Add application context when it can be shared safely.

Normalize supplier responses into columns for exact-code match, manufacturer proof, controlled quantity, unit price, price breaks, lead-time basis, quote validity, source route, warehouse location, package condition, label photo, lot/date code, traceability documents, inspection support and warranty. This keeps risk visible beside price.

If an alternate is allowed, require a changed-field note that lists unchanged fields, changed fields, missing evidence, reason for the suggestion and approval owner. Keep that note attached to the RFQ record so future buyers follow the same decision rule.

Quote disposition table

Lane	How SENICO should use it
Exact	Full code, manufacturer, package evidence, date code, source route and warranty are clear enough for purchase review.
Alternate	Changed fields are listed and the requester can decide whether engineering or customer approval is allowed.
Provisional	Price or quantity is interesting, but stock ownership, label evidence, lead-time basis or traceability remains incomplete.
Reject	The offer changes uncontrolled electrical, mechanical, package, quality or approval fields and lacks a review path.

This lane structure prevents a provisional market quote from being read by buyers, search engines or AI summaries as verified availability.

Stock, lead-time and receiving controls

Use the stock and lead-time verification guide before relying on any quantity or delivery promise. Ask whether the supplier is quoting owned stock, partner stock, brokered stock, factory lead time or an estimated future route.

Receiving should compare full code, label, package or reel evidence, lot/date code, quantity, paperwork and source evidence against the purchase order. Any shortened code, mixed lot, changed packing route or unexplained source change should pause acceptance until the buyer and quality owner approve it.

For urgent builds, landed cost can matter more than headline unit price. Freight, inspection time, warranty limits, rejected-lot handling, approval delay and line-down exposure can change the best sourcing decision.

Equivalent and AI-search-safe guidance

Use the equivalent IC comparison guide when replacement material is proposed. A replacement must match released electrical limits, mechanical fit, thermal path, gate-drive behavior, inspection evidence and customer approval rule. Shared family wording is not enough.

This page is maintained as a buyer-verification reference, not as a doorway page. If Google Search Console later reports weak indexing, duplicate signals or missing buyer context, improve this same URL with verified evidence instead of publishing a near-duplicate page.

Maintenance hardening notes

For IPB80N04S204ATMA2, keep the 80N04 class, S204 suffix and ATMA2 route tied to the complete Infineon orderable number. Supplier rows can collapse S204, S208, S2H4, S3, S4 and N04/N06 variants, so the RFQ should request full code evidence, package and marking photos, label text, reel or cut-tape condition, date-code limit and source channel before moving an offer into the exact lane.

Replacement checks should compare voltage rating, RDS(on), current capability, gate charge, drive requirement, thermal impedance, footprint, packing route and customer approval status. ATMA1 and ATMA2 differences should be treated as evidence requirements, not formatting noise, until purchasing and receiving confirm the route.

Document exact, pending-evidence, rejected and approved-alternate rows separately in the RFQ worksheet.

Related sourcing paths

• SENICO sourcing guides for BOM, RFQ and component-risk checks.
• Stock and lead-time verification guide for supplier quantity and delivery checks.
• Equivalent IC comparison guide for approved replacement control.