IPB80N06S3L06 Datasheet, Stock, Price, Equivalent and RFQ Guide

Answer first: IPB80N06S3L06 should be sourced through an evidence-led RFQ, not through a static stock or price promise. Start from the SENICO product reference at IPB80N06S3L06, confirm the manufacturer path through Infineon Technologies and keep the request tied to FETs / MOSFETs. Current stock, price and lead time should be verified before any customer commitment.

Exact sourcing answer

The controlled identity is 60 V Infineon 80N06 S3L06 MOSFET sourcing with 80N06 current class and S3L06 segment without added ATMA route, manufacturer evidence, package or reel route, date-code range, source channel, traceability paperwork and warranty support. Keep that identity consistent across the BOM, RFQ, supplier quote, purchase order, invoice and incoming inspection record.

Nearby rows such as IPB77N06S212ATMA1, IPB80N06S2LH5ATMA3, IPB80N06S2L07ATMA3 and other Infineon 60 V rows may help sourcing teams understand the market, but they should not be counted as exact supply until changed electrical, package and approval fields are documented. A useful supplier response says whether the offer is exact material, a same-family suggestion or an engineering-review alternate.

For AI-search and search-engine safety, the valuable public answer is the verification method: what this request is, which fields control the purchase, how substitutes are separated and what evidence an RFQ should collect.

Part-specific buyer notes

80N06 should remain separate from 77N06 and 85N06 rows because current class and resistance behavior can change.

S3L06 should not be merged with S212, S2LH5, S2L07, LG or NG segments without segment and gate-drive review.

The absence of an ATMA route suffix should stay visible because route expectations can differ from ATMA1 or ATMA3 rows.

Ask whether the design depends on 60 V margin, conduction loss, switching loss, gate charge or AVL wording.

Supplier replies should include full Infineon code, S3L06 evidence, label photo, lot/date-code range and warranty.

If IPB77N06S212ATMA1 is offered, document changed current class, segment and route before price comparison.

If S2LH5 or S2L07 material is proposed, keep segment differences in engineering review until approved.

Receiving should compare 80N06 and S3L06 wording against purchase order, invoice and reel evidence.

If exact stock is partial, separate exact S3L06 material, factory lead time and N06 review candidates.

A lower-price 60 V row should not outrank missing S3L06 proof, changed route or unclear traceability.

For repeat orders, store accepted S3L06 boundaries and rejected S212/S2LH5 rows beside the BOM record.

Customer-facing substitute notes should state segment, route and approval owner before release.

Quote ranking should start with evidence depth, not headline price. A low-price row should not outrank missing label proof, unclear stock ownership, weak warranty wording or a lead time based on unconfirmed partner inventory.

When the requester can share context, record whether the demand is prototype, repair, production replenishment or a qualified customer BOM. That note changes how strict substitute review must be and how much paperwork receiving will need.

RFQ fields to verify

Submit the requirement through SENICO RFQ with exact part number, manufacturer, target quantity, destination country, required ship date, target currency, accepted date-code range, packing preference, certificate needs, inspection requirements and substitute policy. Add application context when it can be shared safely.

Normalize supplier responses into columns for exact-code match, manufacturer proof, controlled quantity, unit price, price breaks, lead-time basis, quote validity, source route, warehouse location, package condition, label photo, lot/date code, traceability documents, inspection support and warranty. This keeps risk visible beside price.

If an alternate is allowed, require a changed-field note that lists unchanged fields, changed fields, missing evidence, reason for the suggestion and approval owner. Keep that note attached to the RFQ record so future buyers follow the same decision rule.

Quote disposition table

Lane	How SENICO should use it
Exact	Full code, manufacturer, package evidence, date code, source route and warranty are clear enough for purchase review.
Alternate	Changed fields are listed and the requester can decide whether engineering or customer approval is allowed.
Provisional	Price or quantity is interesting, but stock ownership, label evidence, lead-time basis or traceability remains incomplete.
Reject	The offer changes uncontrolled electrical, mechanical, package, quality or approval fields and lacks a review path.

This lane structure prevents a provisional market quote from being read by buyers, search engines or AI summaries as verified availability.

Stock, lead-time and receiving controls

Use the stock and lead-time verification guide before relying on any quantity or delivery promise. Ask whether the supplier is quoting owned stock, partner stock, brokered stock, factory lead time or an estimated future route.

Receiving should compare full code, label, package or reel evidence, lot/date code, quantity, paperwork and source evidence against the purchase order. Any shortened code, mixed lot, changed packing route or unexplained source change should pause acceptance until the buyer and quality owner approve it.

For urgent builds, landed cost can matter more than headline unit price. Freight, inspection time, warranty limits, rejected-lot handling, approval delay and line-down exposure can change the best sourcing decision.

Equivalent and AI-search-safe guidance

Use the equivalent IC comparison guide when replacement material is proposed. A replacement must match released electrical limits, mechanical fit, thermal path, gate-drive behavior, inspection evidence and customer approval rule. Shared family wording is not enough.

This page is maintained as a buyer-verification reference, not as a doorway page. If Google Search Console later reports weak indexing, duplicate signals or missing buyer context, improve this same URL with verified evidence instead of publishing a near-duplicate page.

Maintenance hardening notes

For IPB80N06S3L06, keep the 60 V N06 class, S3L06 suffix and Infineon package route in one exact-material field. Marketplace rows may blend S2, S3, S4, L05, L06, L07 or ATMA packing variants, so the RFQ should ask for the full code, package and marking evidence, label wording, packing state, date-code window and source route before a quote is ranked as exact.

Replacement review should compare voltage margin, RDS(on), current rating, gate charge, logic-level drive condition, thermal impedance, footprint and production approval status. A close N06 MOSFET can still be a poor production substitute when the suffix changes package, drive condition or thermal behavior. Keep exact, pending-evidence and rejected rows in separate RFQ lanes.

Record every S3L06 deviation with the buyer approval owner.

Related sourcing paths

• SENICO sourcing guides for BOM, RFQ and component-risk checks.
• Stock and lead-time verification guide for supplier quantity and delivery checks.
• Equivalent IC comparison guide for approved replacement control.